Irenic Thoughts

Irenic. The word means peaceful. This web log (or blog) exists to create an ongoing, and hopefully peaceful, series of comments on the life of King of Peace Episcopal Church. This is not a closed community. You are highly encouraged to comment on any post or to send your own posts.

5/09/2006

The DaVinci Disclaimer

"It's not theology or history." That statement is from Ron Howard, Director of The DaVinci Code in response to calls for a disclaimer at the start of the movie noting that the film is a work of fiction. Howard went on to tell The Los Angeles Times that "Spy thrillers don't start off with disclaimers" and neither will this new flick.

The controversy comes as the movie, like the book, makes the claim that Jesus married Mary Magdelene and fathered children. A claim that many flakes (one example is here) and almost no reputable historians or theolgians (see link below) hold as true. Making similar claims about the prophet who founded Islam would get you killed, but Christians are more tolerant.

Are Christians tolerant to a fault? Does not standing up for our faith cause some to go astray? Either way, a disclaimer about fiction wouldn't likely change anything.

Here is what will happen disclaimer or no disclaimer. The movie will draw large crowds and then those people will decide for themselves what they think. Most will think about the merits of the movie only—was it entertaining? Many, however, will consider their faith, positively and negatively, in light of what they hear and see in the movie. Some will be drawn back to faith in Christ and some pushed away, most will just find it something to talk about. This is what DaVinci author Dan Brown hoped for the book in a page at his website
My hope in writing this novel was that the story would serve as a catalyst and a springboard for people to discuss the important topics of faith, religion, and history.
If nothing else, the book has done just that and the movie will similarly spark discussion.

A well-reasoned response to the claims of the book are offered from respected Anglican theologian N.T. Wright here online: Decoding The Da Vinci Code.

peace,
Frank+
The Rev. Frank Logue, Pastor + King of Peace Episcopal Church

2 Comments:

  • At 5/10/2006 2:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Do you know for sure that Jesus DIDN'T marry Mary? When you get the proof please let the world know.

     
  • At 5/10/2006 4:02 PM, Blogger King of Peace said…

    Proof. That's an interesting corner to paint me into as it is notoriously difficult to prove that something did NOT happen compared to proving that something did happen.

    The closest thing one can offer as proof is that there was no need of a cover up. There were no prophecies predicting a celebate Messiah. And as a 1st century Israeli Rabbi Jesus would be expected to be married (as some of his disciples were). Scripture had spoken of marriage as a sign of God's love for humans and so there was no reason why Jesus could not marry. So, the fact that he is presented as single is mpre awkward than a wife and children would be. That's not how we see it now because Jesus was single and so Christians have always been taught that way. But had we always known he had been married, that could have fit equally well.

    So, no I can't offer conclusive proof that Jesus never married. But likewise, no matter what you may read in The DaVinci Code, we have no authentic account of Jesus' life that presents him as married to anyone. Some have stretched to suggest that the wedding in Cana was Jesus' own wedding, but there is NOTHING in that story to suggest anything of the kind. Even the Gnostic Gospels make no such claim about Jesus.

    A more reasoned view on all of this than I can present is found at The Challenge of Historic Christianity to Post-Modern Fantasy.

    peace,
    Frank+
    The Rev. Frank Logue

     

Post a Comment

<< Home